Comments on: The Cost Of Popularity http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/ The day to day goings on of our family Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:24:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: .htaccess Inheritance Gotcha | #if debug http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-178454 .htaccess Inheritance Gotcha | #if debug Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:57:07 +0000 http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/#comment-178454 [...] in May 2006, people from MySpace were hotlinking images from my site. The cost of popularity from my anonymous MySpace friends was pushing my web hosting account well over its monthly data [...] [...] in May 2006, people from MySpace were hotlinking images from my site. The cost of popularity from my anonymous MySpace friends was pushing my web hosting account well over its monthly data [...]

]]> By: Search Engine Image Traffic Recovering « Post Archive « www.lattimore.id.au http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-79126 Search Engine Image Traffic Recovering « Post Archive « www.lattimore.id.au Mon, 16 Apr 2007 11:13:16 +0000 http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/#comment-79126 [...] the cost of being prominently placed within the search engine results had a downside and my site exceeded its monthly bandwidth allocation. I contacted my web host and they graciously re-enabled my account for the rest of the [...] [...] the cost of being prominently placed within the search engine results had a downside and my site exceeded its monthly bandwidth allocation. I contacted my web host and they graciously re-enabled my account for the rest of the [...]

]]> By: Al http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-4924 Al Sat, 13 May 2006 15:03:16 +0000 http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/#comment-4924 Jake, You're right - I didn't notice that I'd written that in the explanation. The RegEx is intended to match <code>jpg</code> or <code>jpeg</code>. I've amended point #6. Al. Jake,

You’re right – I didn’t notice that I’d written that in the explanation. The RegEx is intended to match jpg or jpeg.

I’ve amended point #6.

Al.

]]> By: Jacob http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/comment-page-1/#comment-4915 Jacob Sat, 13 May 2006 12:18:17 +0000 http://www.lattimore.id.au/2006/05/13/the-cost-of-popularity/#comment-4915 correction for your explanation of the regex: doesnt jpe?g mean "jpg or jpeg" and not "jpe or jpeg" as you have indicated in your post? correction for your explanation of the regex:
doesnt jpe?g mean “jpg or jpeg” and not “jpe or jpeg” as you have indicated in your post?

]]>