<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Optimisation (SEO): Dashes Versus Underscores</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lattimore.id.au/2005/05/28/search-engine-optimisation-seo-dashes-versus-underscores/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lattimore.id.au/2005/05/28/search-engine-optimisation-seo-dashes-versus-underscores/</link>
	<description>The day to day goings on of our family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:24:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.lattimore.id.au/2005/05/28/search-engine-optimisation-seo-dashes-versus-underscores/comment-page-1/#comment-257864</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lattimore.id.au/2005/05/27/search-engine-dashes-versus-underscores/#comment-257864</guid>
		<description>The information above is still relevant today.

Choosing a dash or hyphen over and underscore has been discussed at length in the search engine optimisation space for a long time and the opinion from Google has changed over time:

&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2005&lt;/a&gt;: Matt Cutts wrote that you should use a dash instead of an underscore&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;2007: Matt Cutts said that Google were going to treat the underscore as a word separator just like the dash or hyphen, however it never made it into production&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3SFVfDIS5k&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2009&lt;/a&gt;: Matt Cutts said that you should use a dash and that they may look at working on the underscore functionality again in the future.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

The general guidance has remained quite consistent over time though, which has been if your site is well established and using underscores - not to change existing content. If you&#039;re adding new content, by all means create it using hyphens as a word separator.

My personal opinion on the above only differs if you&#039;re web site is within a highly competitive sector. If your site is about gambling, sex/porn or pharmaceuticals - then it could warrant a site wide change to give you any additional boost that you&#039;re not already receiving. If on the other hand you&#039;re not in a competitive space, it wouldn&#039;t be worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The information above is still relevant today.</p>
<p>Choosing a dash or hyphen over and underscore has been discussed at length in the search engine optimisation space for a long time and the opinion from Google has changed over time:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/dashes-vs-underscores/" rel="nofollow">2005</a>: Matt Cutts wrote that you should use a dash instead of an underscore</li>
<li>2007: Matt Cutts said that Google were going to treat the underscore as a word separator just like the dash or hyphen, however it never made it into production</li>
<li><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3SFVfDIS5k" rel="nofollow">2009</a>: Matt Cutts said that you should use a dash and that they may look at working on the underscore functionality again in the future.</li>
</ul>
<p>The general guidance has remained quite consistent over time though, which has been if your site is well established and using underscores &#8211; not to change existing content. If you&#8217;re adding new content, by all means create it using hyphens as a word separator.</p>
<p>My personal opinion on the above only differs if you&#8217;re web site is within a highly competitive sector. If your site is about gambling, sex/porn or pharmaceuticals &#8211; then it could warrant a site wide change to give you any additional boost that you&#8217;re not already receiving. If on the other hand you&#8217;re not in a competitive space, it wouldn&#8217;t be worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Vogel</title>
		<link>http://www.lattimore.id.au/2005/05/28/search-engine-optimisation-seo-dashes-versus-underscores/comment-page-1/#comment-257725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Vogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lattimore.id.au/2005/05/27/search-engine-dashes-versus-underscores/#comment-257725</guid>
		<description>Is this still a relevant information in 2009?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this still a relevant information in 2009?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

